Adversaries may establish persistence through executing malicious commands triggered by a user’s shell.
a13e DCV does not yet ship a13e-curated detection rules for T1156. The page is descriptive: it covers what the technique is, which platforms attackers exercise it on, and where the upstream Sigma community has rules you can translate via CloudSigma. As CloudSigma's corpus extends to this technique, the page lights up with embedded rules automatically — no manual update required.
T1156 sits inside MITRE ATT&CK's enterprise matrix; adversaries reach it via initial access or credential-access steps and pivot from it into impact, lateral movement, or persistence. Cloud blueprints — AWS CloudTrail, Azure Sign-in, GCP Audit Logs — are the high-fidelity observation surfaces where T1156 most reliably surfaces in production. DCV maps each cloud-native finding type to the technique so an a13e coverage scan tells you whether your existing detection controls cover T1156 before an adversary exercises it.
DCV does not currently ship a cloud-audit-log finding mapped directly to T1156. The technique earns a library page because a13e research cites it. Detection sits downstream, on the exploitation step the technique enables.
CloudSigma does not currently ship a stand-alone rule that fires on T1156 in isolation. Generate a starting-point rule from the CVE, vulnerability disclosure, or threat-research blog post that exercises this technique, then pair it with SIEM-side correlation before enabling in production.
High-fidelity detection of T1156 requires correlation
across multiple events. For example, a credential-validation call
followed by a reconnaissance chain (List* /
Describe*) within a short window from an unfamiliar
source. A single-event Sigma rule on
GetCallerIdentity alone fires constantly on
legitimate CLI, SDK and CI/CD activity.
Where you have a specific advisory, vulnerability disclosure or blog post that exercises T1156-style abuse, CloudSigma can generate a starting-point rule from that input. You then deploy it in your SIEM and combine it with the SIEM's native correlation features (timeframe joins across users, source-IP anomalies, impossible-travel checks). For T1156 specifically the generated rule is rarely sufficient on its own; pair it with the SIEM-side correlation logic before enabling in production.
Adversaries may establish persistence through executing malicious commands triggered by a user’s shell. User shells execute several configuration scripts at different points throughout the session based on events. For example, when a user opens a command line interface or remotely logs in (such as SSH) a login shell is initiated. The login shell executes scripts from the system (/etc) and the user’s home directory (~/) to configure the environment. All login shells on a system use /etc/profile when initiated. These configuration scripts run at the permission level of their directory and are...
a13e DCV does not currently map a cloud-native finding directly to T1156. This page is included for research and coverage-planning context; when platform mappings are added, this answer will list them.
a13e CloudSigma does not currently publish a production Sigma rule for T1156. When rules are added, supported SIEM dialects will appear here after SigmaHQ validation and target-SIEM conversion pass.
No production rules are published for T1156 yet. The count grows when CloudSigma ships new rules tagged to T1156 or when DCV adds a cloud-native finding type that maps to the technique.
Run a free coverage scan in a13e DCV: it inspects your AWS, Azure, and GCP detection content + maps each existing detection to MITRE ATT&CK. Where T1156 is uncovered, DCV surfaces the gap with an actionable Sigma rule template you can copy into your SIEM. CloudSigma generates a fresh translation per SIEM dialect on demand.
Run a free coverage scan in a13e DCV at https://app.a13e.com. The scan reads your existing detection content (Splunk, Sentinel, Chronicle, Elastic) and reports a per-technique coverage map against MITRE ATT&CK. The output highlights which techniques your DCV instance currently catches and which ones need new rules from CloudSigma.